Deposited preprints
Articles
Nine articles, listed newest first. Each is deposited with a DOI and a cryptographic manifest; Zenodo is the canonical archive.
The Three Differences and the Sense of Being
What / HOW, HOW / HOW, and this own / another own. The problem: three differences are routinely collapsed into one. A substitution trial separates them, and the argument then asks how plural ways belong to one ontology without a prior positive unifier.
The Science of Ontological Nodes
The Object, Method, and Founding of Ontosystematics. Ontology can name its authors and schools with precision but cannot yet refer with the same precision to its own positions. The founding article of the inquiry charged with charting them.
Ontological Pluralism Without Degrees of Being
The plural ontology. Degrees divide a way rather than multiply ways. The quantifier-first settlement gives results about a formal apparatus and never supplies the object; a paired substitution trial does.
Begleiten können
Ownness and the Warrant Structure of the Critical Architecture. The Kantian test: two readings press on the differentia of the who and close each other’s exits. Both are answered from the double modal at B131, where the relation turns out to be title-holding rather than constitutive.
Are We Making It Up?
The Forced Intention. The discipline of the intention: whether an inquiry that proceeds by disclosure made up its answer, and before that whether it made up its problem. The case is one in which the intention was not free.
Across the Categorial Difference
Focality, Univocity, Ownness. The setting: if being is said in many ways, what holds those ways in one field rather than a mere list? Focality and univocity have appeared to exhaust the answers, and a third is available.
What Would Show You Wrong?
On Falsifiability and Ontological Method. The method: what an ontology proceeding by disclosure owes, what it does not owe, and where the demand for falsifiability turns into something else.
The Individuating Factor
Ownness, Jemeinigkeit, Haecceitas. The defence: why ownness is not haecceity plus mineness, argued against Scotus and Heidegger from the texts.
The Calculus of Modal Coincidence
The Grammar of A-Metaphysical Ontology. The doctrine: what a who is, how it is reached, and the grammar that prevents a bearer from returning.
What Would Show You Wrong? and Are We Making It Up? are a pair: the first disciplines the fulfilment, the second the intention.
Four of them are registered with the United States Copyright Office (2026), case no. 1-15225033791.
Zenodo is the archival record and holds the DOI; the article pages here are the readable version of record, carrying the full text.